Last reviewed:
Connecticut bills, public acts, signed dates, effective dates, regulations, technical standards, compact records and enforcement evidence checked: .
Connecticut Gambling Law Tracker 2026:What Changed, What Is Active and What Comes Next
Connecticut enacted two major gaming measures in 2026: Public Act 26-53 and Public Act 26-82.
A bill number, chamber vote, governor signature, public-act number, effective date and implementation record are different status stages. Use the final act and applicable section date—not an introduced summary or stale news headline—as the controlling change record.
PA 26-53 and PA 26-82.
Tracked under PA 26-53.
Tracked under PA 26-82.
Enactment, effective date and implementation require separate evidence.
Written by Michael Johnson. Connecticut legislative, regulatory and consumer-protection evidence reviewed by Sarah Roberts. Neither reviewer is presented as an attorney, legislator, regulator, tribal official or casino representative. Research process: How we test. Editorial standards: Editorial policy.
What changed in Connecticut gambling law in 2026?
Connecticut enacted two major gaming measures in 2026. HB 5229 became Public Act 26-53; its college-campus gaming-ad restriction took effect July 1, while its remaining consumer-protection provisions require section-specific effective-date checks. SB 296 became Public Act 26-82 and is partly effective now; its sports-wagering cheating provision takes effect October 1, 2026. A filed or passed bill is not controlling law until enactment and the applicable effective date, and regulations, compacts and enforcement actions remain separate evidence layers.
Information route: this page reports public status and implementation evidence. It does not provide personal legal or tax advice and does not predict future legislation, litigation or enforcement outcomes.
Connecticut Gambling Law Changes in 90 Seconds
| Question | Current answer | Controlling source | Next check | Main boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What changed overall in 2026? | Connecticut enacted two major gaming measures: PA 26-53 and PA 26-82. | Final public acts, CGA histories and governor signature notifications. | Codification and agency implementation. | Two acts do not mean every section has the same effective date. |
| What is the current status of HB 5229 / PA 26-53? | HB 5229 completed legislative action, became PA 26-53 and was signed May 19, 2026. | PA 26-53, CGA bill history and Governor Bill Notification 2026-8. | Each section’s effective date and DCP implementation. | The act’s subject summary does not replace final section text. |
| What took effect on July 1, 2026? | The PA 26-53 restriction involving gaming advertising at college and university campuses took effect July 1, 2026. | Final act and OLR’s 2026 higher-education acts report. | DCP or covered-licensee implementation evidence. | Do not apply July 1 automatically to every PA 26-53 section. |
| What is the current status of SB 296 / PA 26-82? | SB 296 became PA 26-82 and was signed May 26, 2026; some provisions are effective from passage. | PA 26-82, CGA history and Governor Bill Notification 2026-10. | Current codification and October implementation. | A partly effective act still requires section-level status. |
| What takes effect on October 1, 2026? | PA 26-82’s sports-wagering cheating update takes effect October 1, 2026. | Final act and OLR criminal-justice/public-safety report. | October 1 codification and enforcement guidance. | The date does not establish that an individual act satisfies the offense. |
| Which major 2026 proposals did not become law? | SB 183’s gambling-loss deduction and HB 5038’s prediction-market restrictions did not become public acts in the 2026 regular session. | Official CGA bill histories. | Reintroduction, special session or a later tax/prediction-market bill. | A filing, hearing or favorable discussion does not change current law. |
| What other records can change implementation? | Regulations, technical standards, tribal compacts, memoranda, license actions, enforcement orders and court decisions can affect implementation. | DCP document hub, BIA/tribal records, orders and current court records. | Document publication or official amendment. | These records are not interchangeable with a statute. |
| What is the main limitation of this tracker? | It resolves public status but cannot decide personal legality, tax treatment, contract rights, jurisdiction or one complaint. | The exact statute, regulation, compact, operator record and professional advice where needed. | The user’s actual issue and current controlling record. | Public information is not individual legal advice. |
Current Connecticut Gambling Change Ledger
Read each row across from final status to its controlling source, effective date, practical effect and next recheck trigger.
| Change | Final status | Controlling source | Final action | Effective or implementation date | Practical effect | Next recheck trigger | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA 26-53 overall gaming measure | Enacted | Final PA 26-53 plus the final bill analysis. | Signed May 19, 2026. | Sections 3-5 took effect May 19; Sections 1-2 took effect July 1, 2026. | Creates customer-assistance, advertising, prediction-market study, geolocation and lottery-system testing changes. | Current codification and DCP implementation of each section. | That every section became active on signature or July 1. |
| College and university gaming advertising | Active | PA 26-53 Section 2 and OLR's higher-education report. | Enacted within PA 26-53. | July 1, 2026. | Restricts covered gaming advertising at higher-education athletic facilities, websites, social media and mobile applications, subject to the final statutory exceptions. | DCP guidance, enforcement records or a later statutory amendment. | That all gambling advertising is prohibited or every off-campus ad is lawful. |
| Gaming-licensee customer-assistance telephone access | Active | PA 26-53 Section 1. | Included in the signed public act. | July 1, 2026. | Covered licensees must provide and display a toll-free assistance number; a prerecorded message may direct a caller to online help. | DCP implementation or current licensee compliance evidence. | A guaranteed response time, resolution or withdrawal outcome. |
| Online gaming-account withdrawal-cancellation proposal | Removed before enactment | Final PA 26-53 and the final amended bill analysis. | House Amendment A removed the withdrawal provisions. | None. | PA 26-53 did not enact the earlier proposal restricting cancellation of online gaming-account withdrawals. | A later bill, regulation or current operator term. | That an introduced or pre-amendment withdrawal rule became law. |
| AI targeting of certain online sports wagers | Removed before enactment | Final PA 26-53 and the final amended bill analysis. | House Amendment A removed the AI provision. | None. | PA 26-53 did not enact the earlier proposal concerning AI targeting of certain sports wagers. | A later bill, DCP rule or current platform term. | That Connecticut enacted a general gambling-AI restriction in PA 26-53. |
| Prediction-market study and report | Active study requirement | PA 26-53 Section 3. | Included in PA 26-53. | Effective May 19, 2026; report due February 1, 2027. | Requires DCP, with the named state and tribal participants, to study prediction markets and report to the legislature. | Publication of the report and any resulting legislation. | That prediction-market legality or litigation will be resolved in advance. |
| PA 26-82 consumer-protection and enforcement changes | Enacted with split dates | Final PA 26-82 and the final OLR analysis. | Signed May 26, 2026. | Sections 2 and 4 took effect May 26; Section 1 takes effect October 1, 2026. | Clarifies underage-account and wagering penalties, authorizes specified relief against unlicensed sports-wagering services, and schedules CUTPA restitution and investigation-record changes. | October 1 codification and DCP or attorney-general implementation. | A guaranteed refund, restitution award, enforcement result or complaint outcome. |
| PA 26-82 sports-wagering cheating update | Enacted · scheduled | PA 26-82 Section 3 and OLR's criminal-justice report. | Signed May 26, 2026. | October 1, 2026. | Extends the cheating framework to covered attempts, offers, solicitations or benefits intended to alter a sports-wager outcome. | October 1 codification and enforcement guidance. | That one disputed wager, error or suspicious result is criminal cheating. |
| PA 25-112 gaming, lottery and sweepstakes baseline | Recent enacted baseline | Final PA 25-112 plus current statutes and later acts. | Signed June 24, 2025. | Section-specific 2025 dates; current statutes and later acts control. | Provides a recent baseline for gaming, lottery, geolocation and specified sweepstakes-related changes. | Current-statute comparison and later public acts. | That every original section remains unchanged in 2026. |
| SB 183 gambling-loss income-tax deduction | Not enacted | Official SB 183 bill history. | Referred to the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee on February 11, 2026. | None. | The proposal did not create a new Connecticut gambling-loss deduction. | Reintroduction, budget legislation or a later tax act. | A user's current federal or Connecticut tax treatment. |
| HB 5038 prediction-market under-21 proposal | Not enacted | Official HB 5038 bill history. | Referred February 5, 2026; public hearing held February 18. | None. | The proposal did not create a new statutory age or advertising rule. | Reintroduction or a different prediction-market act. | That existing state laws or enforcement positions do not apply. |
| DCP prediction-market cease-and-desist orders | Enforcement action | DCP's December 3, 2025 release and underlying orders. | Orders issued to Kalshi, Robinhood Derivatives and Crypto.com. | The order date controls, subject to later agency or court action. | States DCP's position that the named unlicensed sports-event-contract activity violates Connecticut law. | A current court docket, stay, settlement, amended order or DCP update. | A new statute or a final nationwide prediction-market ruling. |
Next Connecticut Gaming-Law Checkpoints
PA 26-53 signed
The final public act, rather than pre-signature reporting, controls the enacted text.
College-campus gaming-ad restriction active
Check DCP and covered-licensee implementation under the exact final statutory scope.
PA 26-82 signed and partly effective
Verify current codification of sections effective from passage.
Sports-wagering cheating update takes effect
Recheck the codified statute, enforcement guidance and any conforming records.
Prediction-market study/report checkpoint
DCP's report is due February 1, 2027. Recheck the official report and any resulting legislation when published.
From Proposal to Controlling Rule
| Status stage | What it means | Controlling evidence | What you can safely conclude | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filed or raised bill | A proposal has entered the legislative process. | Official bill page and introduced text. | “Proposed” or “filed.” | Committee support, passage, signature or legal effect. |
| Committee or public-hearing stage | The bill received committee action, testimony or a hearing. | CGA history, committee record and substitute text. | “Under consideration” with the exact stage. | Final language or enactment. |
| Passed one chamber | The House or Senate approved a version. | Official roll call and current text. | “Passed the House” or “passed the Senate.” | Approval by the other chamber or the governor. |
| Passed both chambers | The legislature completed passage of matching final language. | CGA history, final amendment and enrolled text. | “Passed the legislature” or “sent to the governor.” | Signature, veto outcome or effective date. |
| Signed and assigned a public-act number | The governor signed the final measure and it became a public act. | Public-act PDF, bill history and governor notification. | “Enacted as PA [number] on [date].” | That every section is already effective. |
| Effective | The applicable section’s legal start date has arrived. | Effective-date clause and current codification. | “Effective [exact date].” | Complete agency or operator implementation. |
| Implemented or operational | The responsible agency, tribe, licensee or system has implemented the change. | Regulation, guidance, technical standard, license condition, official notice or current system record. | “Implemented” only with current operational evidence. | A permanent rule or one user’s outcome. |
Which Legal Source Controls the Claim?
| Source layer | What it can control | Examples | Required check | What it cannot prove alone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current statute or public act | Enacted legal duties, prohibitions, authority and effective dates. | Chapter 229b, PA 26-53 and PA 26-82. | Final text, section, amendments, effective date and codification. | Complete operational implementation. |
| DCP regulation | Detailed regulatory requirements within statutory authority. | Online casino, sports wagering and related gaming regulations. | Current adopted version, effective date and amendment history. | One operator’s current configuration or account decision. |
| Technical standard or specification | Platform, security, testing, data, live-dealer or system requirements. | Electronic wagering and live-dealer technical standards. | Current version, revision date and exact product scope. | One user outcome, title availability or better safety. |
| Compact, memorandum or agreement | State-tribal rights, obligations, revenue or market structure. | Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan agreements and amendments. | Current signed version, federal approval where required and later amendments. | One platform’s current lobby or account terms. |
| License, approval or credential | Who may perform an authorized gaming role. | Master wagering license, online gaming operator or supplier credential. | Current entity, credential class, status and expiration. | Every product, brand, title or account outcome. |
| Enforcement order or court order | The named parties, conduct, remedy, stay or judgment within the order’s scope. | DCP cease-and-desist orders and current litigation orders. | Current docket, appeal, stay, settlement or superseding order. | A new statute or a universal nationwide rule. |
| Operator terms or account record | Current account, promotion, transaction, withdrawal and support facts. | Terms, status wording, transaction ID and support ticket. | Current version and user-specific record. | Statewide law or another operator’s duty. |
Four Connecticut Gaming-Law Claims Resolved
“HB 5229 passed the legislature, so every change was active on May 5”
Legislative evidence: both chambers completed passage in early May.
Enactment evidence: the governor signed the bill on May 19 and it became PA 26-53.
Effective-date evidence: the act uses section-specific dates, including a July 1 date for the college-campus advertising provision.
Correct conclusion: passage, enactment and effective date are separate stages.
“Connecticut banned users from canceling online casino withdrawals”
Version check: earlier HB 5229 material discussed broader withdrawal-cancellation restrictions.
Final-text check: the final public act controls and must be read after the House amendment.
Correct conclusion: House Amendment A removed the withdrawal provisions, so PA 26-53 did not enact that proposal.
Do not conclude: that introduced or pre-amendment language became law.
“SB 183 lets Connecticut taxpayers deduct gambling losses”
Proposal check: SB 183 proposed a personal-income-tax deduction tied to gambling losses.
Final-status check: it did not become a 2026 public act.
Correct conclusion: SB 183 did not create the proposed Connecticut deduction.
Do not conclude: anything about one taxpayer’s current federal or state treatment without the tax owner and professional advice where needed.
“DCP’s prediction-market order created a new Connecticut gambling law”
Source-class check: the December 2025 record is a cease-and-desist enforcement action.
Scope check: it applies DCP’s legal position to named platforms and conduct.
Correct conclusion: the order is an enforcement layer that may be affected by later agency or court action.
Do not conclude: that an enforcement press release is a public act or final nationwide ruling.
Connecticut Gambling-Law Source and Status Snapshot
Legislative sources control bill, act and effective-date claims. DCP sources control current regulatory documents and state enforcement records. NCPG supports gambling-harm routing only. A source from one class must not be used as a substitute for another.
| Source | Source class | Source owner | Checked | What it supports | What it does not prove | Safest use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HB 5229 Bill Status | Official legislative status evidence | Connecticut General Assembly | July 24, 2026 | bill history, chamber actions, amendments, public-act assignment and final status | section-specific effective dates without final text | HB 5229 status chronology |
| Public Act 26-53 | Official enacted-law evidence | Connecticut General Assembly | July 24, 2026 | final enacted language, section numbers and effective-date clauses | complete DCP or operator implementation | controlling PA 26-53 claim source |
| HB 5229 Final Bill Analysis | Official legislative-analysis evidence | Connecticut Office of Legislative Research | July 24, 2026 | plain-language explanation of final amended bill | anything that conflicts with the public-act text | final-act interpretation and introduced-versus-final comparison |
| Governor Bill Notification 2026-8 | Official executive signature evidence | Office of Governor Ned Lamont | July 24, 2026 | May 19, 2026 signature of PA 26-53 | that every section was immediately effective | governor-signature date |
| OLR Acts Affecting Higher Education 2026 | Official legislative-research evidence | Connecticut Office of Legislative Research | July 24, 2026 | July 1, 2026 college/university gaming-advertising change | every PA 26-53 provision or implementation outcome | higher-education effective-date cross-check |
| SB 296 Bill Status | Official legislative status evidence | Connecticut General Assembly | July 24, 2026 | SB 296 passage, final action and public-act status | section-specific effective dates without final text | SB 296 chronology |
| Public Act 26-82 | Official enacted-law evidence | Connecticut General Assembly | July 24, 2026 | final CUTPA, record-retention and sports-wagering cheating provisions and dates | one investigation, conviction, complaint or restitution result | controlling PA 26-82 source |
| Governor Bill Notification 2026-10 | Official executive signature evidence | Office of Governor Ned Lamont | July 24, 2026 | May 26, 2026 signature of PA 26-82 | that every section uses the same effective date | governor-signature date |
| OLR Acts Affecting Criminal Justice and Public Safety 2026 | Official legislative-research evidence | Connecticut Office of Legislative Research | July 24, 2026 | October 1, 2026 sports-wagering cheating update and sections effective from passage | individual criminal liability or enforcement outcome | PA 26-82 effective-date cross-check |
| SB 183 Bill Status | Official legislative proposal-status evidence | Connecticut General Assembly | July 24, 2026 | the proposed gambling-loss deduction and final non-enactment status | current personal tax treatment | failed-proposal boundary |
| HB 5038 Bill Status | Official legislative proposal-status evidence | Connecticut General Assembly | July 24, 2026 | prediction-market proposal history and final non-enactment status | current prediction-market legality or enforcement outcome | failed-proposal boundary |
| Public Act 25-112 | Official recent enacted-law baseline | Connecticut General Assembly | July 24, 2026 | 2025 gaming, lottery and sweepstakes-related baseline changes | that every original section remains unchanged after later acts | recent-law dependency check |
| Connecticut General Statutes Chapter 229b | Official current codified-statute evidence | Connecticut General Assembly | July 24, 2026 | current codified online gaming and sports-wagering framework | uncodified implementation, one account term or every related chapter | current-statute cross-check |
| Connecticut Gaming Laws and Regulations | Official regulator legal-document hub | Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection | July 24, 2026 | current DCP law and regulation routes | one bill’s legislative status or one operator outcome | current regulatory-document discovery |
| Gaming Revenue, Statistics and Documents | Official regulator document and agreement hub | Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection | July 24, 2026 | regulations, technical standards, live-dealer specifications, compacts, memoranda and agreements | that every listed document was newly changed in 2026 | implementation and source-layer tracking |
| Legalized Gambling in Connecticut | Official regulator current-status evidence | Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection | July 24, 2026 | the principle that gambling is prohibited unless specifically authorized and the current regulatory context | the full status of one new bill or personal legal advice | default state-law boundary |
| DCP Prediction-Market Cease-and-Desist Action | Official state enforcement evidence | Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection | July 24, 2026 | December 3, 2025 orders involving Kalshi, Robinhood Derivatives and Crypto.com and DCP’s stated legal position | a new statute, final court result or nationwide rule | enforcement-versus-legislation boundary |
| National Problem Gambling Helpline | Independent national support evidence | National Council on Problem Gambling | July 24, 2026 | call/text 1-800-MY-RESET, chat and 24/7/365 support | Connecticut law, bill, enforcement, account or litigation status | gambling-harm support |
What This Law Tracker Does Not Prove
- A filed bill
- Does not prove committee approval, chamber passage, signature or legal effect.
- A bill passed by one chamber
- Does not prove passage by the other chamber or final language.
- A bill passed by both chambers
- Does not prove governor signature, veto outcome or effective date.
- A governor signature
- Does not mean every section is effective immediately.
- A public-act number
- Does not replace section-level effective-date and amendment checks.
- An effective statute
- Does not prove full agency, tribal or operator implementation.
- A regulation or technical standard
- Does not create a statute or guarantee one game, account or transaction outcome.
- A compact, memorandum or agreement
- Does not prove every consumer operator, title or platform setting.
- An enforcement action
- Does not automatically create a new law or establish a final court result.
- This tracker
- Does not provide personal legal, tax or litigation advice or guarantee how an authority will apply the law.
Stop Signals When a Law Change Feels Like a Reason to Gamble
- A newly enacted protection makes gambling feel safe.Consumer-protection rules do not remove financial loss, randomness or account risk.
- An advertising restriction makes every other promotion feel approved.Absence from one prohibition does not prove legality, value or suitability.
- An old AI-proposal headline makes a platform feel unable to influence behavior.That provision was removed before PA 26-53 was enacted, and platform marketing or session pressure still requires separate checks.
- A prediction-market enforcement update creates urgency to withdraw, transfer or place another position.Stop and verify the current platform, order, account record and official status first.
- A proposed tax deduction makes losses feel recoverable.A proposal is not tax relief, and a deduction does not make gambling profitable.
- Debt, secrecy, stress, urgency or loss chasing appears.Use a timeout or self-exclusion, or call/text 1-800-MY-RESET.
Use the Page That Owns the Detailed Connecticut Question
The change-status answer is complete above. Use another page only when the question becomes narrower.
| Detailed question | Owner route | What it owns | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is the complete current Connecticut legal framework? | Connecticut gambling laws | Current statutes, legal products, prohibited routes and authority. | This tracker owns changes, dates and implementation status. |
| Which tribe, operator or supplier currently holds an authorized role? | Connecticut authorized gaming providers | Master relationships, entities, credential classes and eLicense checks. | A new act does not automatically change every credential. |
| How does current Connecticut sports wagering work? | Connecticut sports betting | Accounts, geolocation, retail tickets, prohibited events, settlement and records. | A law change does not replace the current operator and wager record. |
| Which sportsbooks are currently authorized? | Connecticut authorized sportsbooks | Current sportsbook entities, affiliations and online/retail status. | Bill discussion does not establish current authorization. |
| How do I document and escalate an account or wagering complaint? | Connecticut gaming complaints | Operator-first evidence, DCP escalation and issue ownership. | A new statute does not guarantee complaint acceptance or relief. |
| How do self-exclusion, limits and support work? | Connecticut responsible gambling | State, operator and property controls plus support. | Use before pressure escalates. |
| What age, identity and access requirements apply? | Connecticut gambling age | Product-specific age, identification, location and account access. | A proposed age bill does not replace current law. |
| How do current gambling-income and loss rules apply? | Connecticut gambling taxes | Federal/state information, W-2G, withholding and records. | SB 183 did not create the proposed deduction; this is not personal tax advice. |
| A platform, regulator message or legal claim may be fake | Connecticut gambling scams | Cloned brands, fake regulators, illegal platforms and payment pressure. | Do not send money or identity documents before verification. |
| What do current Connecticut gaming numbers show? | Connecticut gambling revenue and statistics | Current data periods, definitions, revenue, tax and transfer metrics. | A legal change does not prove immediate revenue impact. |
Connecticut Gambling Law Tracker FAQ
What is the Connecticut gambling law tracker?
It tracks changes to Connecticut gambling law by bill status, public-act number, signature date, effective date, implementation stage, failed proposal, regulatory document and enforcement action.
What major Connecticut gaming laws were enacted in 2026?
Connecticut enacted PA 26-53 from HB 5229 and PA 26-82 from SB 296. Each act must be read section by section because the provisions do not all share one effective date.
Is HB 5229 now Connecticut law?
Yes. HB 5229 completed legislative action, became Public Act 26-53 and was signed by the governor on May 19, 2026.
What Connecticut gaming rule took effect on July 1, 2026?
The PA 26-53 restriction involving covered gaming advertising at college and university campuses took effect July 1, 2026. Other PA 26-53 sections require their own effective-date checks.
Did Connecticut ban cancellation of online gambling withdrawals?
No. House Amendment A removed the online gaming-account withdrawal provisions before enactment. PA 26-53 therefore did not enact the earlier proposal about canceling withdrawals.
What is Public Act 26-82?
PA 26-82 is the enacted version of SB 296. It includes consumer-protection or record-related changes and updates the cheating framework to cover specified sports-wagering conduct.
What Connecticut gaming-law change takes effect October 1, 2026?
PA 26-82’s sports-wagering cheating provision takes effect October 1, 2026. The date does not determine whether any individual conduct satisfies the statute.
Did Connecticut enact a new gambling-loss tax deduction in 2026?
No. SB 183 proposed a Connecticut personal-income-tax deduction for gambling losses but did not become a public act in the 2026 regular session.
Did HB 5038 become Connecticut prediction-market law?
No. HB 5038 did not become a 2026 public act. Existing statutes, DCP enforcement actions and current court developments must be evaluated separately.
Are prediction markets legal in Connecticut?
DCP has treated named sports-event-contract platforms as offering unlicensed sports wagering and issued cease-and-desist orders. Current legal status may also depend on later court orders, stays, settlements or federal developments, so recheck the official enforcement and court record.
What is the difference between a passed bill, a signed act and an effective law?
A passed bill has completed legislative voting. A signed measure becomes a public act. A section becomes effective only on its stated effective date, and operational implementation may require later agency, tribal or licensee action.
Can a DCP technical standard change gambling requirements without a new bill?
A current technical standard can change or clarify regulated-system requirements within existing authority. It does not become a statute and does not prove one title, account or transaction outcome.
Do tribal compacts and memoranda count as Connecticut gaming-law evidence?
Yes for the rights, obligations and market structure they govern. They are separate from statutes, regulations, licenses and operator terms and must be checked in their current approved form.
How often should the Connecticut gambling law tracker be updated?
Review it whenever a tracked effective date arrives, a bill changes stage, a public act is signed, a regulation or technical standard is revised, a compact is amended, an official report is published or an enforcement or court order changes.
Update Notes
- : Published the Connecticut gambling-law tracker with final 2026 public-act status, signed dates, active and scheduled effective dates, failed proposals, regulatory and compact source layers, prediction-market enforcement classification and next recheck triggers.